{"success":true,"data":{"pressRelease":{"id":"48138","rtpr_id":"nPn17hgSka","ticker":"SES","exchange":"NYSE","all_tickers":["SES"],"title":"SueWallSt Reminds SES AI Corporation Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 26, 2026 - SES","author":"PR Newswire","published_at":"2026-05-28T13:01:54.068Z","article_body":"SueWallSt Reminds SES AI Corporation Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 26, 2026 - SES\n\nPR Newswire\n\nNEW YORK, May 28, 2026\n\nWall Street's $51.67 Million Revenue Expectation for SES AI Was Built on\nAlleged Phantom Deals and Circular Transactions; When 2026 Guidance Came in at\nJust $30M-$35M, Shareholders Lost 36.8% Overnight\n\nNEW YORK, May 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The gap between what Wall Street\nexpected and what SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES) delivered on March 4, 2026\nwas not a minor miss. Analysts had projected $51.67 million in 2026 revenue.\nThe company guided $30 million to $35 million, a shortfall of up to 42%. SES\nshares collapsed 36.8%, erasing $0.63 per share in a single session.\n\n(https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2937620/suewallst_logo_1_Logo.html)\n\nFind out if you qualify to recover losses from the SES AI stock decline\n(https://edge.prnewswire.com/c/link/?t=0&l=en&o=4698020-13&h=4115690707&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsuewallst.com%2Flawsuits%2Fses-ai-corporation-class-action-lawsuit-ses%3Fprid%3D187125%26wire%3D4&a=Find+out+if+you+qualify+to+recover+losses+from+the+SES+AI+stock+decline)\n. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at jlevi@SueWallSt.com\n(mailto:jlevi@SueWallSt.com)  or (888) SueWallSt.\n\nThe securities class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased SES\nsecurities between January 29, 2025 and March 4, 2026 contends that the\nanalyst consensus was inflated by a series of misleading corporate\nannouncements about partnerships, acquisitions, and AI platform revenue that\nlacked substance. The lead plaintiff deadline is June 26, 2026.\n\nHow Analyst Expectations Were Allegedly Inflated\n\nSell-side coverage of SES AI during the Class Period incorporated several\ncompany announcements at face value, the lawsuit asserts. These included:\n\n * A January 2025 MOU with AISPEX targeting up to $45 million in battery energy\nstorage revenue, later alleged to involve a counterparty operating from a\n\"ramshackle building surrounded by shipping containers\" with signage for a\ndifferent company\n * The September 2025 acquisition of Shenzhen UZ Energy for $25.5 million,\npromoted as entry into a \"$300 billion ESS market,\" though the action claims\nUZ Energy had minimal U.S. presence and shared an address with two other\nentities\n * An October 2025 joint venture term sheet with Hisun New Energy Materials,\ntouted for its \"existing manufacturing capacity,\" though the complaint\nidentifies Hisun's U.S. corporate address as a residential home and its\nplanned facility site as undeveloped land\n * Molecular Universe license revenue that a former employee described as tied to\ncircular purchasing arrangements\nEach announcement contributed to the revenue trajectory that analysts built\ninto their models.\n\nThe Benzinga Assessment\n\nOn March 5, 2026, Benzinga published an article entitled \"SES AI Stock Plunges\n30% After Weak 2026 Revenue Guidance,\" noting that \"the main drag on sentiment\nwas SES AI's 2026 revenue guidance\" and that the shortfall \"rais[ed] concerns\nabout the pace of commercialization for its Energy Storage Systems, drone\nbattery and materials businesses.\"\n\nThe filing recounts that remaining performance obligations had already dropped\n92% in a single quarter during 2025, a metric that the action claims should\nhave signaled to the market that the analyst consensus was built on unreliable\nfoundations.\n\nWhy Analyst Shifts Matter for Investors\n\nWhen company disclosures are alleged to be materially misleading, analyst\nmodels built on those disclosures transmit the alleged inflation directly into\nstock prices. The complaint maintains that SES AI's public statements created\nan artificial revenue trajectory that analysts incorporated into price targets\nand earnings estimates. The March 2026 guidance correction removed that\nartificial support in a single after-hours call.\n\n\"When analyst expectations are built on incomplete or misleading company\ndisclosures, the resulting corrections can cause significant investor harm.\nThe magnitude of the gap between the $51.67 million consensus and SES AI's\nactual guidance speaks to the scale of the alleged information asymmetry.\" --\nJoseph E. Levi, Esq.\n\nSpeak with an attorney about recovering your SES AI investment losses\n(https://edge.prnewswire.com/c/link/?t=0&l=en&o=4698020-13&h=2084837156&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsuewallst.com%2Flawsuits%2Fses-ai-corporation-class-action-lawsuit-ses%3Fprid%3D187125%26wire%3D4&a=Speak+with+an+attorney+about+recovering+your+SES+AI+investment+losses)\n or call (888) SueWallSt.\n\nLEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE: June 26, 2026\n\nSueWallSt, Top 50 securities litigation firm (ISS, seven consecutive years).\nOver 70 professionals. Hundreds of millions recovered for investors.\n\nFrequently Asked Questions About the SES Lawsuit\n\nQ: How much did SES stock drop? A: Shares fell approximately 36.8%, a decline\nof $0.63 per share, after the company disclosed 2026 revenue guidance of $30\nmillion to $35 million versus the $51.67 million analyst consensus on March 4,\n2026. Investors who purchased shares during the class period at artificially\ninflated prices may be entitled to compensation.\n\nQ: What specific misstatements does the SES lawsuit allege? A: The complaint\nalleges SES AI made materially false or misleading statements regarding\nphantom partnership deals, circular revenue transactions involving its\nMolecular Universe platform, and the operational capacity of joint venture\npartners during the class period. When the true state was revealed, the stock\nprice declined sharply.\n\nQ: What do SES investors need to do right now? A: Gather brokerage records\nincluding purchase dates, share quantities, and prices paid. Contact SueWallSt\nfor a free, no-obligation evaluation at jlevi@SueWallSt.com\n(mailto:jlevi@SueWallSt.com)  or (888) SueWallSt. No immediate action is\nrequired to remain eligible as a class member.\n\nQ: What is a lead plaintiff and why does it matter? A: A lead plaintiff is\nthe investor appointed by the court to represent the entire class. Lead\nplaintiffs are typically investors with the largest documented losses. Being\nappointed does not increase individual recovery but gives direct oversight of\nhow the case is run.\n\nQ: Do I need to go to court or give testimony? A: No. The overwhelming\nmajority of class members never appear in court or give depositions. You\nsubmit a claim form to receive your portion of recovery.\n\nQ: What if I already sold my SES shares, can I still recover losses? A: Yes.\nEligibility is based on when you purchased, not whether you still hold them.\nInvestors who bought during the class period and sold at a loss may still\nparticipate.\n\nCONTACT:\n\nLevi & Korsinsky, LLP\n\nJoseph E. Levi, Esq.\n\n33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor\n\nNew York, NY 10004\n\njlevi@SueWallSt.com (mailto:jlevi@SueWallSt.com)\n\nTel: (888) SueWallSt\n\nFax: (212) 363-7171\n\nView original content to download\nmultimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/suewallst-reminds-ses-ai-corporation-investors-of-the-pending-class-action-lawsuit-with-a-lead-plaintiff-deadline-of-june-26-2026---ses-302783648.html\n(https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/suewallst-reminds-ses-ai-corporation-investors-of-the-pending-class-action-lawsuit-with-a-lead-plaintiff-deadline-of-june-26-2026---ses-302783648.html)\n\nSOURCE SueWallSt.com\n\n\n\nPhoto: \nhttps://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2937620/suewallst_logo_1_Logo.jpg\n\nCopyright (c) 2026 PR Newswire Association,LLC. All Rights Reserved.","article_body_html":"","raw_payload":{"data":{"id":"nPn17hgSka","title":"SueWallSt Reminds SES AI Corporation Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 26, 2026 - SES","author":"PR Newswire","ticker":"SES","created":"2026-05-28T13:01:54.068Z","tickers":["SES"],"exchange":"NYSE","article_body":"SueWallSt Reminds SES AI Corporation Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit With a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 26, 2026 - SES\n\nPR Newswire\n\nNEW YORK, May 28, 2026\n\nWall Street's $51.67 Million Revenue Expectation for SES AI Was Built on\nAlleged Phantom Deals and Circular Transactions; When 2026 Guidance Came in at\nJust $30M-$35M, Shareholders Lost 36.8% Overnight\n\nNEW YORK, May 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The gap between what Wall Street\nexpected and what SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES) delivered on March 4, 2026\nwas not a minor miss. Analysts had projected $51.67 million in 2026 revenue.\nThe company guided $30 million to $35 million, a shortfall of up to 42%. SES\nshares collapsed 36.8%, erasing $0.63 per share in a single session.\n\n(https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2937620/suewallst_logo_1_Logo.html)\n\nFind out if you qualify to recover losses from the SES AI stock decline\n(https://edge.prnewswire.com/c/link/?t=0&l=en&o=4698020-13&h=4115690707&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsuewallst.com%2Flawsuits%2Fses-ai-corporation-class-action-lawsuit-ses%3Fprid%3D187125%26wire%3D4&a=Find+out+if+you+qualify+to+recover+losses+from+the+SES+AI+stock+decline)\n. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at jlevi@SueWallSt.com\n(mailto:jlevi@SueWallSt.com)  or (888) SueWallSt.\n\nThe securities class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased SES\nsecurities between January 29, 2025 and March 4, 2026 contends that the\nanalyst consensus was inflated by a series of misleading corporate\nannouncements about partnerships, acquisitions, and AI platform revenue that\nlacked substance. The lead plaintiff deadline is June 26, 2026.\n\nHow Analyst Expectations Were Allegedly Inflated\n\nSell-side coverage of SES AI during the Class Period incorporated several\ncompany announcements at face value, the lawsuit asserts. These included:\n\n * A January 2025 MOU with AISPEX targeting up to $45 million in battery energy\nstorage revenue, later alleged to involve a counterparty operating from a\n\"ramshackle building surrounded by shipping containers\" with signage for a\ndifferent company\n * The September 2025 acquisition of Shenzhen UZ Energy for $25.5 million,\npromoted as entry into a \"$300 billion ESS market,\" though the action claims\nUZ Energy had minimal U.S. presence and shared an address with two other\nentities\n * An October 2025 joint venture term sheet with Hisun New Energy Materials,\ntouted for its \"existing manufacturing capacity,\" though the complaint\nidentifies Hisun's U.S. corporate address as a residential home and its\nplanned facility site as undeveloped land\n * Molecular Universe license revenue that a former employee described as tied to\ncircular purchasing arrangements\nEach announcement contributed to the revenue trajectory that analysts built\ninto their models.\n\nThe Benzinga Assessment\n\nOn March 5, 2026, Benzinga published an article entitled \"SES AI Stock Plunges\n30% After Weak 2026 Revenue Guidance,\" noting that \"the main drag on sentiment\nwas SES AI's 2026 revenue guidance\" and that the shortfall \"rais[ed] concerns\nabout the pace of commercialization for its Energy Storage Systems, drone\nbattery and materials businesses.\"\n\nThe filing recounts that remaining performance obligations had already dropped\n92% in a single quarter during 2025, a metric that the action claims should\nhave signaled to the market that the analyst consensus was built on unreliable\nfoundations.\n\nWhy Analyst Shifts Matter for Investors\n\nWhen company disclosures are alleged to be materially misleading, analyst\nmodels built on those disclosures transmit the alleged inflation directly into\nstock prices. The complaint maintains that SES AI's public statements created\nan artificial revenue trajectory that analysts incorporated into price targets\nand earnings estimates. The March 2026 guidance correction removed that\nartificial support in a single after-hours call.\n\n\"When analyst expectations are built on incomplete or misleading company\ndisclosures, the resulting corrections can cause significant investor harm.\nThe magnitude of the gap between the $51.67 million consensus and SES AI's\nactual guidance speaks to the scale of the alleged information asymmetry.\" --\nJoseph E. Levi, Esq.\n\nSpeak with an attorney about recovering your SES AI investment losses\n(https://edge.prnewswire.com/c/link/?t=0&l=en&o=4698020-13&h=2084837156&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsuewallst.com%2Flawsuits%2Fses-ai-corporation-class-action-lawsuit-ses%3Fprid%3D187125%26wire%3D4&a=Speak+with+an+attorney+about+recovering+your+SES+AI+investment+losses)\n or call (888) SueWallSt.\n\nLEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE: June 26, 2026\n\nSueWallSt, Top 50 securities litigation firm (ISS, seven consecutive years).\nOver 70 professionals. Hundreds of millions recovered for investors.\n\nFrequently Asked Questions About the SES Lawsuit\n\nQ: How much did SES stock drop? A: Shares fell approximately 36.8%, a decline\nof $0.63 per share, after the company disclosed 2026 revenue guidance of $30\nmillion to $35 million versus the $51.67 million analyst consensus on March 4,\n2026. Investors who purchased shares during the class period at artificially\ninflated prices may be entitled to compensation.\n\nQ: What specific misstatements does the SES lawsuit allege? A: The complaint\nalleges SES AI made materially false or misleading statements regarding\nphantom partnership deals, circular revenue transactions involving its\nMolecular Universe platform, and the operational capacity of joint venture\npartners during the class period. When the true state was revealed, the stock\nprice declined sharply.\n\nQ: What do SES investors need to do right now? A: Gather brokerage records\nincluding purchase dates, share quantities, and prices paid. Contact SueWallSt\nfor a free, no-obligation evaluation at jlevi@SueWallSt.com\n(mailto:jlevi@SueWallSt.com)  or (888) SueWallSt. No immediate action is\nrequired to remain eligible as a class member.\n\nQ: What is a lead plaintiff and why does it matter? A: A lead plaintiff is\nthe investor appointed by the court to represent the entire class. Lead\nplaintiffs are typically investors with the largest documented losses. Being\nappointed does not increase individual recovery but gives direct oversight of\nhow the case is run.\n\nQ: Do I need to go to court or give testimony? A: No. The overwhelming\nmajority of class members never appear in court or give depositions. You\nsubmit a claim form to receive your portion of recovery.\n\nQ: What if I already sold my SES shares, can I still recover losses? A: Yes.\nEligibility is based on when you purchased, not whether you still hold them.\nInvestors who bought during the class period and sold at a loss may still\nparticipate.\n\nCONTACT:\n\nLevi & Korsinsky, LLP\n\nJoseph E. Levi, Esq.\n\n33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor\n\nNew York, NY 10004\n\njlevi@SueWallSt.com (mailto:jlevi@SueWallSt.com)\n\nTel: (888) SueWallSt\n\nFax: (212) 363-7171\n\nView original content to download\nmultimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/suewallst-reminds-ses-ai-corporation-investors-of-the-pending-class-action-lawsuit-with-a-lead-plaintiff-deadline-of-june-26-2026---ses-302783648.html\n(https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/suewallst-reminds-ses-ai-corporation-investors-of-the-pending-class-action-lawsuit-with-a-lead-plaintiff-deadline-of-june-26-2026---ses-302783648.html)\n\nSOURCE SueWallSt.com\n\n\n\nPhoto: \nhttps://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2937620/suewallst_logo_1_Logo.jpg\n\nCopyright (c) 2026 PR Newswire Association,LLC. All Rights Reserved."},"type":"article","timestamp":"2026-05-28T13:01:54.112988404Z","server_sent_at_ms":1779973314112},"received_at":"2026-05-28T13:01:54.225Z","source_url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/suewallst-reminds-ses-ai-corporation-investors-of-the-pending-class-action-lawsuit-with-a-lead-plaintiff-deadline-of-june-26-2026---ses-302783648.html"},"analysis":{"id":"37572","press_release_id":"48138","analysis_json":{"industry":{"label":"Aerospace & Defense","sector":"Industrials"},"redFlags":[],"eventType":"legal_litigation","narrative":"SueWallSt, operating as Levi & Korsinsky, issued a press release reminding SES AI investors of a pending securities class action lawsuit.\n\nThe release highlights a lead plaintiff deadline of June 26, 2026, and solicits investors who purchased shares between January 29, 2025, and March 4, 2026, to contact the firm.\n\nThe underlying complaint alleges that analyst expectations were inflated by misleading announcements regarding partnerships and revenue, leading to a 36.8% stock drop when guidance was revised downward.","sentiment":"neutral","agentHooks":{"shouldPost":false,"suggestedAngle":"Plaintiff-firm solicitation -- suppress."},"keyFigures":{"customDimensions":{"stock_decline_pct":"36.8%","stock_decline_usd":"$0.63","company_guidance_revenue":"$30 million to $35 million","analyst_consensus_revenue":"$51.67 million"}},"quotedText":"When analyst expectations are built on incomplete or misleading company disclosures, the resulting corrections can cause significant investor harm.","namedEntities":{"people":[{"name":"Joseph E. Levi","role":"Attorney, Levi & Korsinsky"}],"products":[],"companies":[{"name":"SES AI Corporation","ticker":"SES","relationship":"defendant"},{"name":"SueWallSt","relationship":"plaintiff law firm"},{"name":"Levi & Korsinsky, LLP","relationship":"plaintiff law firm"},{"name":"AISPEX","relationship":"alleged partner"},{"name":"Shenzhen UZ Energy","relationship":"acquired entity"},{"name":"Hisun New Energy Materials","relationship":"alleged partner"},{"name":"Molecular Universe","relationship":"subsidiary/platform"},{"name":"Benzinga","relationship":"media outlet"}],"dollarAmounts":[{"amount":"$51.67 million","context":"analyst consensus revenue expectation"},{"amount":"$30 million to $35 million","context":"company's 2026 revenue guidance"},{"amount":"$0.63","context":"per-share stock decline"},{"amount":"$45 million","context":"alleged AISPEX MOU value"},{"amount":"$25.5 million","context":"Shenzhen UZ Energy acquisition price"},{"amount":"$300 billion","context":"alleged ESS market size"}]},"materialImpact":{"score":1,"reasoning":"This is a plaintiff law-firm solicitation issued by SueWallSt (Levi & Korsinsky). It contains standard lead-plaintiff deadline reminders and contact CTAs. No new disclosure from the issuer, no certified class, and no settlement announced."},"tickerRelevance":{"others":[],"primary":"SES"},"globalImportance":15,"audienceRelevance":10,"eventTypeSecondary":[],"importanceComponents":{"signalType":"noise","tickerTier":"small-cap","eventGravity":"law-firm-solicitation","issuerAuthored":false}},"event_type":"legal_litigation","event_type_secondary":null,"sentiment":"neutral","material_impact_score":1,"narrative":"SueWallSt, operating as Levi & Korsinsky, issued a press release reminding SES AI investors of a pending securities class action lawsuit.\n\nThe release highlights a lead plaintiff deadline of June 26, 2026, and solicits investors who purchased shares between January 29, 2025, and March 4, 2026, to contact the firm.\n\nThe underlying complaint alleges that analyst expectations were inflated by misleading announcements regarding partnerships and revenue, leading to a 36.8% stock drop when guidance was revised downward.","key_figures":{"customDimensions":{"stock_decline_pct":"36.8%","stock_decline_usd":"$0.63","company_guidance_revenue":"$30 million to $35 million","analyst_consensus_revenue":"$51.67 million"}},"named_entities":{"people":[{"name":"Joseph E. Levi","role":"Attorney, Levi & Korsinsky"}],"products":[],"companies":[{"name":"SES AI Corporation","ticker":"SES","relationship":"defendant"},{"name":"SueWallSt","relationship":"plaintiff law firm"},{"name":"Levi & Korsinsky, LLP","relationship":"plaintiff law firm"},{"name":"AISPEX","relationship":"alleged partner"},{"name":"Shenzhen UZ Energy","relationship":"acquired entity"},{"name":"Hisun New Energy Materials","relationship":"alleged partner"},{"name":"Molecular Universe","relationship":"subsidiary/platform"},{"name":"Benzinga","relationship":"media outlet"}],"dollarAmounts":[{"amount":"$51.67 million","context":"analyst consensus revenue expectation"},{"amount":"$30 million to $35 million","context":"company's 2026 revenue guidance"},{"amount":"$0.63","context":"per-share stock decline"},{"amount":"$45 million","context":"alleged AISPEX MOU value"},{"amount":"$25.5 million","context":"Shenzhen UZ Energy acquisition price"},{"amount":"$300 billion","context":"alleged ESS market size"}]},"model_name":"qwen3_6_27b_awq","prompt_hash":"sha256:727b4b9429a443af","schema_hash":"sha256:05005c02d9cffac9","created_at":"2026-05-28T13:17:44.196Z","global_importance":15,"audience_relevance":10,"importance_components":{"signalType":"noise","tickerTier":"small-cap","eventGravity":"law-firm-solicitation","issuerAuthored":false}},"durationMs":52727,"modelName":"george-droid-qwen-72b"}}